Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 03:58

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Japanese Scientists Develop Artificial Blood Compatible With All Blood Types - Tokyo Weekender
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is the Kia Tasman the ugliest ute of all time?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How does mouth taping affect dreams?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
China Rare-Earth Magnet Maker Gets Green Light for US Exports - Bloomberg
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
India to Open Flagship EV Making Policy to Lure Global Giants - Bloomberg
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
NASA video of moon rocket test shows something just went seriously wrong - Mashable
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.